For years we have heard some politicians complaining about government being “too big” and wanting to make it smaller.
Have you ever once heard anyone say we need RIGHT-SIZED government?
What does this mean?
Private businesses decide what they are going to do. Then they decide how they will do it. They get the right technology and people to efficiently and effectively get it done.
Government is no different, except. . .
We don’t really have an open dialogue about what products and services we need or want from government. Congress does that by passing laws.
We don’t really have an open dialogue about how we’ll pay for the government we have. Congress does that by passing appropriations bills.
What government does do, is set performance objectives in annual plans; measure results; and publish all this so everyone can see how things are going. And like private business, most agencies meet their goals. A few are working to improve, like the VA. Some exceed their gials and are excellent.
We wouldn’t expect a private business to achieve its goals without sufficient people, and then responsibly hold those people accountable for doing their jobs. Government is the same.
Arbitrary claims of “waste” and arbitrary hiring freezes only achieve two things. They diminish our confidence in government without valid evidence. And they diminish government’s capacity to achieve their mission. That hurts us all.
Can we support RIGHT-SIZED government that works well for everyone?
Forward Into the Past
- United, We Might Fall. Divided, We Might Adapt. on civility and disruption in the face of significant power differentials
- The Deeper Q: Capacities For Rational Thought, and Generative Dialogue
- The 2 Q’s and the 3 Ws
- EntreXercises: It Was Just My ‘magination. . .Runnin’ Away With Me. . .
- Not So “Good Enough” – On the need for competitive compensation & benefits in government
The Vault: Archives
- July 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- October 2017
- June 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- November 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- September 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- July 2014
- May 2014
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- June 2013
- April 2013
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- Grateful as always for the amazing topics, questions, and shared learning with amazing people, that make #custserv… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 1 day ago
- #custserv A10: is there a way to share related job openings, that folks in the chat might want or be able to pursue? twitter.com/GregOrtbach/st… 1 day ago
- RT @GregOrtbach: Wow - that’s likely to be filed in the sad… but true category. #CustServ twitter.com/toister/status… 1 day ago
- @MarshaCollier Goodness no. Three of us shared a classic chicken dish, aji de gallina; a shrimp dish in a tomato-b… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 1 day ago
- #custserv A9: I make sure to tell the person their service was great. Then I ask to talk to their supervisor, and… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 1 day ago
- #custserv A8: deep knowledge and understanding of the products, services, and customer experience processes. An op… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 1 day ago
- @MarshaCollier Took me a while to get home from great Peruvian dinner but delighted to catch up here in #custserv as always! 1 day ago
- #custserv A7: first, define a “customer service win.” Share all experiences and stories of delivering service wit… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 1 day ago
- #custserv A6: mentors. Teachers. Observer/assessor feedback helpers. Shared learning. Role play partners. twitter.com/GregOrtbach/st… 1 day ago
- @GregOrtbach Seeing exercises in both success and failure helps. Too many look away from the deep learning that is… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 1 day ago